An Official Statistics
Publication.
Published by:
Information & Analysis
Unit
Legal Services Agency NI
3rd Floor, AIB Building
92
Ann Street
Belfast
BT1 3HH
Publication date: 24th September 2026
During 2025/26, 422 solicitor firms and 633 barristers were registered on LAMS to provide legal services. Among the registered barristers, 119 (19%) were Senior Counsel, while 514 (81%) were Junior Counsel.
At 42.3 registered solicitor firms per 100,000 population, Belfast recorded the highest rate among local government districts in 2025/26. This was followed by Fermanagh and Omagh (28.0) and Newry, Mourne and Down (22.4), with each exceeding the Northern Ireland average of 21.9.
Since 2019/20, authorised expenditure to solicitor firms has increased by 29.3% (£16.0m) in net terms. Over the same period, payments to barristers have risen at a substantially faster rate. Authorisations to Junior Counsel increased by 54.8% (£11.0m), with expenditure to Senior Counsel increasing by 149.7% (£11.4m).
Reflecting the concentration of registered solicitor firms in the area, Belfast accounted for almost half of all solicitor expenditure in 2025/26 (49.0%; £34.6m). This was followed by Newry, Mourne and Down (10.3%; £7.3m), Derry City and Strabane (10.0%; £7.1m) and Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon (7.8%; £5.5m).
A relatively small proportion of firms accounted for the majority of solicitor profit costs. In 2025/26, 17.9% of firms (60) received almost two-thirds (65.7%; £32.3m) of total solicitor profit costs. Each of these firms received at least £250,000, with an average of almost £540,000. For criminal legal aid specifically, 10.5% of firms (29) accounted for 59.9% (£16.4m) of total criminal solicitor profit costs.
In terms of counsel, in 2025/26, 8.2% of barristers (39) received more than one-third (36.5%; £15.4m) of total barrister profit costs, with each receiving at least £250,000 and on average almost £400,000. Expenditure was more concentrated in civil proceedings, where 15.2% of barristers (62) received almost two-thirds (65.5%; £13.8m) of civil barrister profit costs.
Males had a substantially higher legal aid grant rate than females in 2025/26, at 47.3 grants per 1,000 population compared with 18.0. Although civil legal aid grant rates were broadly similar for males and females (10.1 and 9.8 per 1,000 population, respectively), the criminal legal aid grant rate for males (37.3) was close to five times that for females (8.2).
Belfast displays the highest rate of grants per 1,000 resident population with 46.5, followed by Lisburn and Castlereagh (39.5) and Derry City and Strabane (34.9) LGDs, which are all above the NI average of 32.5.
This publication is the latest in a series of Official Statistics released by the Legal Services Agency Northern Ireland (LSANI), and the second to include information for the 2025/26 financial year.
In response to ongoing user needs identified through recent engagement, LSANI has continued to adopt a two-release model (first introduced in 2024/25) for these statistics. The first annual release, Legal Aid in Northern Ireland: Annual Statistics to March 2026, published on 28th May 2026, presented trends in legal aid activity in terms of grants of legal aid and related expenditure for criminal and civil cases from 2019/20 onwards. This reflects the period since LSANI’s digital case management system (LAMS) became operational. This second release extends this analysis by offering more detailed insights into the utilisation of legal aid by both applicants and suppliers throughout Northern Ireland.
A publication schedule for forthcoming Official Statistics releases is available on the LSANI website.
As an executive agency of the Department of Justice (DoJ), the core function of LSANI, as an operational arm of the Department, is to administer publicly funded legal services in Northern Ireland through the:
processing of applications for civil legal services and authorising of independent legal representation for litigants;
assessing and payment of bills for the provision of civil legal services and criminal legal aid; and
provision of a sound evidence base to provide assurances to the Agency’s governance arrangements while supporting wider Departmental policy-led reform projects.
Within Northern Ireland, legal aid is administered and operates across five levels of services: Criminal, Advice and Assistance, Exceptional Funding, Representation Lower and Representation Higher (with the court tier determining the distinction).
Throughout this report, these have been used to further categorise legal aid into:
Criminal – consisting of legal aid for individuals charged with criminal offences across the criminal courts as well as Advice and Assistance provided under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE); and
Civil – includes Advice and Assistance (Non-PACE), Representation in the Lower and Higher Courts and Exceptional Funding.
This section provides an overview of legal aid service provider registrations over time and examines the geographical distribution of solicitor firms up to the year ending March 2026.
Legal aid services in Northern Ireland are delivered to assisted
persons through three main providers who must first register with the
Agency to create an account on the Legal Aid Management System (LAMS):
During 2025/26, a total of 422 solicitor firms registered on LAMS to provide legal aid services - down 2% on the number recorded in 2024/25 (431). The total number of solicitor firms receiving payment during 2025/26 (357) was 5% lower than in 2024/25 (374) (Figure 2.1; Table A1).
Factoring in the Northern Ireland population, the number of firms registered in 2025/26 equates to 22 firms per 100,000 population (Table A2).
2019/20 | 2020/21 | 2021/22 | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Registered Solicitor Firms | 434 | 447 | 461 | 450 | 444 | 431 | 422 |
Solicitor Firms receiving payment | 429 | 394 | 404 | 405 | 376 | 374 | 357 |
During 2025/26, there were 633 barristers registered on LAMS to provide legal services. Whilst this represents an increase of 32 (5%) barristers since LAMS went live in 2019/20, this was 1% (6) reduction from 2024/25.
The total number of barristers receiving payment during 2025/26 showed a slight decrease (9; 2%) from 2024/25.
Compared with 2019/20, the total number of both junior and senior counsel has increased. Junior counsel rose by 2% (10), while senior counsel saw a more substantial increase of 23% (22). In comparison with 2024/25, junior counsel rose by 1% (5), while senior counsel saw a decrease of 8% (11) (Figure 2.2; Table A1).
During 2025/26, there were five third-party payees registered on LAMS to provide legal services (Figure 2.3; Table A1).
2019/20 | 2020/21 | 2021/22 | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Third Party Payees | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
Third Party Payees receiving payment | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
With a solicitor being the first point of contact for legal aid applicants, it is useful to consider the location of solicitor firms to help understand access to justice for the NI population. However, it should be noted that proximity of a residing population to a solicitor firm will provide a partial indication to how well an area is serviced for access to legal aid. Other factors such as proximity to court venue, number of solicitors per firm and area deprivation levels would need to be considered to get a fuller picture.
Figure 2.4 (Table A2) shows the number of solicitor firms registered during 2025/26 by local government district (LGD), number of firms per 100,000 population as well as average minimum distance to nearest solicitor firm.
Local Government District | Solicitor Firms | Firms per 100k Population | Average Distance to nearest Firm (miles) |
|---|---|---|---|
Antrim and Newtownabbey | 14 | 9.5 | 1.5 |
Ards and North Down | 24 | 14.5 | 1.8 |
Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon | 47 | 21.1 | 2.1 |
Belfast | 149 | 42.3 | 0.5 |
Causeway Coast and Glens | 20 | 14.1 | 3.7 |
Derry City and Strabane | 32 | 21.0 | 2.5 |
Fermanagh and Omagh | 33 | 28.0 | 4.0 |
Lisburn and Castlereagh | 12 | 7.9 | 2.0 |
Mid and East Antrim | 19 | 13.6 | 2.4 |
Mid Ulster | 31 | 20.3 | 2.8 |
Newry, Mourne and Down | 41 | 22.4 | 3.0 |
Total | 422 | 21.9 | 2.2 |
Looking at the distribution of registered solicitor firms in 2025/26 across NI by LGD shows that the largest proportion (35%) is located in Belfast council area with 149 firms, followed by 11% (47) in Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon, and 10% (41) in Newry, Mourne and Down. The lowest proportion of solicitor firms is observed in Lisburn and Castlereagh, having 3% (12).
Across LGDs, Belfast also displays the highest number of firms per 100,000 population with 42.3, followed by Fermanagh and Omagh with 28.0 and Newry, Mourne and Down with 22.4. The remaining 8 Local Council areas display a rate lower than the overall NI level (21.9). Lisburn and Castlereagh shows the lowest level with 7.9 firms per 100,000 population, followed by Antrim and Newtownabbey with 9.5.
The NI average minimum distance to the nearest solicitor firm is 2.2 miles. With Belfast having the largest urban population of all LGD’s it is unsurprising that it displays the lowest average proximity at 0.5 miles. This is followed by Antrim and Newtownabbey at 1.5 miles. The highest average proximity to solicitor firms is seen in Fermanagh and Omagh at 4.0 miles which is reflective of its large rural population. For illustrative purposes, Figure 2.5 presents a map of NI indicating the location of solicitor firms along with the population average proximity to nearest solicitor firm by the latest Census Data Zones, where the darker shading indicates areas with a closer average proximity to solicitor firms.
This section provides insights into
authorised expenditure paid to providers of legal aid services,
including a geographical breakdown of expenditure for the period up to
the year ending March 2026.
Looking at overall authorised expenditure provides a fuller picture of the cost of legal aid to the public purse. However, it is worth noting that although the information in this section presents expenditure by provider type, not all of the remuneration value will be for work carried out by the provider. Authorised expenditure can consist of:
Profit Costs – Professional fees paid to providers for the legal services they provide;
VAT – Value Added Tax added to the cost of the service delivered by the provider; and
Disbursements – Predominantly solicitor remuneration for payment made on behalf of their client for third party services e.g. Medical Expert Report.
In 2025/26, Barristers accounted for a larger proportion of taxed case expenditure, receiving 54% (£17.5m), while solicitor firms received 46% (£15.2m).
Looking at taxed case expenditure by barrister type showed that senior counsel accounted for 55% (£9.7m) of barrister expenditure with junior counsel receiving £7.8m (45%) (Figure 3.3; Table A5).
Authorised Expenditure(£) 2024/25 | Percentage(%) 2024/25 | Authorised Expenditure(£) 2025/26 | Percentage(%) 2025/26 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Solicitor Firm | 15,098,154 | 45.2 | 15,222,446 | 46.5 |
Barrister | 18,271,539 | 54.8 | 17,517,394 | 53.5 |
of which Senior | 10,124,166 | 30.3 | 9,720,550 | 29.7 |
of which Junior | 8,147,373 | 24.4 | 7,796,844 | 23.8 |
Total | 33,369,693 | 100.0 | 32,739,841 | 100.0 |
Focusing solely on profit cost expenditure, it is useful to examine how legal aid is distributed among individual solicitor firms and barristers.
Figures 3.10 and 3.11 compare the proportionate distribution of providers by their share of profit cost expenditure received, by provider type across various levels of service. Tables A9 to A14 present more detailed information on the providers within set bandings of profit costs received, also disaggregated by provider type and types of legal aid.
The number of solicitor firms and barristers receiving profit costs is lower than the total number receiving payments reported in Section 2.1. This is because some providers only received disbursements during the year and did not receive any profit cost payments.
Accordingly, each line on the charts should be interpreted independently, as the proportions are calculated using different provider populations.
While overall profit cost expenditure reflects total legal aid income received by providers, expenditure presented for individual service areas does not necessarily represent a provider’s total legal aid income. Many providers undertake work across multiple service areas and may therefore receive legal aid income from more than one category. When considering the distribution of expenditure across Solicitor Firms, it is important to note that individual firms vary in size in terms of solicitor numbers.
Additional information on legal aid expenditure is provided in the LSANI Annual Statistics User Guide.
By default, curves for ‘All’, ‘Criminal’ and ‘Civil’ (profit cost) expenditure are visible in Figures 3.10 and 3.11, but other services (including Criminal Court Tiers) can be switched on/off by clicking on the legend.
Figure 3.10 depicts that, in 2025/26, around a fifth of solicitor firms received around two-thirds of total solicitor profit costs. This is supported by Table A9, which shows that 60 firms (18%) received £32.3m (66%) of solicitor profit costs, with each firm receiving at least £250,000 - on average almost £540,000.
The concentration of expenditure is greater for criminal legal aid than it is for civil, with just over 10% of solicitor firms (29) receiving 60% (£16.4m) of criminal legal aid solicitor profit costs. This pattern is broadly consistent across all Criminal Court Tiers and within the Police and Criminal Evidence (PACE) Advice and Assistance category (Table A10).
Within civil legal services, the distribution of profit cost expenditure across solicitor firms is heavily influenced by representation in the higher and lower courts. However, expenditure within civil Advice and Assistance displays the greatest level of concentration with only 12 solicitor firms (6%) accounting for over 70% (£1.2m) of associated annual profit costs. This is largely attributable to a small number of firms providing specialist advice on immigration and education matters (Table A11).
For barristers, Figure 3.11 shows that the highest earning 20% received around 60% of total barrister profit costs in 2025/26. Table A12 further shows that just over 8% of barristers (39) received over one-third (36%; £15.4m) of total barrister profit costs, with each receiving at least £250,000 and on average almost £400,000.
Unlike the pattern observed for solicitors, Civil legal aid expenditure among barristers was more concentrated, largely reflecting expenditure on representation in the higher courts. Around 15% of barristers (62 individuals) received almost two-thirds (£13.8m) of civil barrister profit costs (Table A12).
The distribution of Criminal barrister profit cost expenditure is largely influenced by work undertaken in the Crown Court and Magistrates’ Courts. However, expenditure is more concentrated within the Other Criminal Courts category, with around two-thirds of expenditure received by 22 barristers (14% of those undertaking this type of legal aid work; Table A13).
This section provides an overview of the characteristics of applicants to whom legal aid was granted in 2025/26, either by the Courts or the Agency, with a focus on age, gender and geographic location.
The figures in this section are derived from personal information recorded as part of the formal application process. In cases where such information is unknown or not available, they have been excluded from the respective analyses.
As legal aid is awarded and administered on a case-level basis, it is not possible to examine applications on an individual (person) basis. If the same individual is granted legal aid on multiple occasions within the reporting period, their characteristics will feature several times within the data.
In 2025/26, a total of 264 legal aid grants were issued where the age and/or gender of the assisted person was not recorded at the time of application (47 with missing gender and 223 with missing age). Aggregate gender figures include all grants for which gender information is available, irrespective of whether age information was recorded. However, grants with missing age information are excluded from the socio-demographic analysis presented below, as results are disaggregated by both age and gender.
It is evident from Figure 4.1 and Table A15 that legal aid is more frequently granted to males than females. In 2025/26, 28% (17,625) of all applications were granted to females, compared with 72% to males (44,955). This male dominance in overall legal aid grants is driven by the vastly higher number of grants to males in criminal proceedings.
For both genders, the 30–39 age group displayed the highest volume of grants, accounting for over a third of both female (36%; 6,296) and male (34%; 15,359) grants in 2025/26. The second most common age group was 40–49 comprising just under one fifth of female (19%; 3,432) and male (19%; 8,375) grants. (Figure 4.1; Table A15).
When standardised using the latest Northern Ireland mid-year population estimates, individuals aged 25 to 39 were the most likely to receive legal aid in 2025/26, regardless of gender. Males aged 30–39 displayed the highest overall grant rate at 123.9 per 1,000 population, followed closely by those aged 25–29 (116.7). Among females, the corresponding rates were notably lower at 48.4 and 42.7 respectively (Table A15).
At 47.3 per 1,000 population, the overall legal aid grant rate for males was two-and-a-half that of females (18.0 per 1,000). Despite displaying similar grant rates for civil cases (10.1 for males and 9.8 for females), males were just under five times more likely to be the recipient of criminal legal aid (37.3 compared with 8.2).
To further explore the relationship between age, gender, and legal aid uptake, a relative index was calculated. This index divides the number of grants to each age-gender group by the corresponding population estimate, and then normalises these values against the group with the lowest utilisation – in this case females aged 60+, set as the reference value of 1.
The results indicate that a male aged 30–39 is 52.0 times more likely to receive legal aid than a female aged 60+ (the reference group), while a female counterpart aged 30-39 is 20.3 times more likely. Males aged 25–29 followed closely with an index of 49.0, with females in this group displaying an index score of 17.9.
While civil legal aid uptake was broadly similar across both genders, a disparity becomes clear in criminal cases. As illustrated in Figure 4.2, both males and females aged 30–39 had comparable civil index values (18.3 and 19.2 respectively), but diverged significantly in criminal legal aid, with males reaching an index of 101.1 compared to 22.0 for females (Figure 4.2; Table A15).
As civil legal aid in Northern Ireland is predominantly granted in relation to family matters (Section 4.3 of Legal Aid in Northern Ireland: Annual Statistics to March 2026), it is perhaps unsurprising that middle-aged groups display the higher indexes, where the presence of dependent children is more common. This demographic pattern is consistent across both males and females, reflecting the adversarial nature of family law proceedings in which both parties—often parents—are typically involved in the one case.
In contrast, criminal legal aid displays a marked gender disparity. This aligns with the latest Official Statistics from the Public Prosecution Service for Northern Ireland (PPSNI), which reported that 78% of suspects on case files received in 2025/26 were male, while the largest proportion of suspects (28%) fell within the 26–35 age group, with 69% aged between 18 and 45. These figures closely mirror the demographic profile of those receiving criminal legal aid to support their defence.
Northern Ireland is comprised of 11 Council Areas, formally referred to as Local Government Districts (LGDs). Where a valid postcode has been provided as part of the application process, this has been used to assign the LGD.
From Table A16 it is apparent that, in 2025/26, the greatest volume of legal aid applications were granted to applicants in the Belfast LGD. At 16,377, grants to those in Belfast were almost three times that of the second highest district (Lisburn and Castlereagh; 5,997).
Once standardised by the resident population of each LGD (to produce comparable statistics), Belfast continues to display the highest rate of grants (46.5 per 1,000 population), again followed by Lisburn and Castlereagh (39.5) alongside Derry City and Strabane (34.9) LGDs, which are all above the NI average of 32.5 per 1,000 population (Figures 4.3 and 4.4).
In terms of criminal cases, Belfast displays the highest rate of grants at 32.2 per 1,000 population. This is 43% higher than the Northern Ireland average (22.5) and compares with the second highest rate of 26.1 in Derry City and Strabane. However, when it comes to civil legal aid, Lisburn and Castlereagh LGD displays the highest rate at 22.2 per 1,000 population, with Belfast second highest at 14.3.
Not only does Lisburn and Castlereagh display the highest rate of civil grants per 1,000 population across NI (22.2), and a rate that is more than double the NI average (10.0), but interestingly, it is also the only council area in Northern Ireland where civil grants exceeded criminal grants in 2025/26 (Figure 4.4 and Table A16). While the rate of criminal grants is comparable with other regions, it is the particularly high rate of civil grants to applicants within this LGD that causes this distortion. This is driven by the unique make-up of the local resident population that incorporates both HM Prison Maghaberry and Hydebank Young Offenders Centre. Of the 3,372 civil applications granted to those in the Lisburn and Castlereagh LGD in 2025/26, the majority were granted to applicants registered in these establishments. It has been estimated that removing these cases from the analysis would generate a civil grant rate in line with other similar LGDs.
Finally, the 2025/26 legal aid grant rate is lowest for applicants living in Fermanagh and Omagh (17.3 per 1,000 population) and Mid Ulster (17.4), with both LGDs displaying similar rates for both criminal (12.5 and 13.0 respectively) and civil (4.8 and 4.3 respectively) grants.
Local Government District (LGD) | Applications granted per 1,000 population - Criminal | Applications granted per 1,000 population - Civil | Applications granted per 1,000 population - Total |
|---|---|---|---|
Antrim and Newtownabbey | 15.5 | 7.3 | 22.8 |
Ards and North Down | 12.8 | 7.0 | 19.8 |
Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon | 17.6 | 7.1 | 24.8 |
Belfast | 32.2 | 14.3 | 46.5 |
Causeway Coast and Glens | 13.5 | 8.2 | 21.7 |
Derry City and Strabane | 26.1 | 8.8 | 34.9 |
Fermanagh and Omagh | 12.5 | 4.8 | 17.3 |
Lisburn and Castlereagh | 17.3 | 22.2 | 39.5 |
Mid and East Antrim | 17.2 | 5.8 | 23.0 |
Mid Ulster | 13.0 | 4.3 | 17.4 |
Newry, Mourne and Down | 18.1 | 7.5 | 25.6 |
Northern Ireland (Total) | 22.5 | 10.0 | 32.5 |
Financial eligibility is a key determinant in assessing entitlement to legal aid and, as such, grant volumes would be expected to correlate with an area’s levels of deprivation. Analysis of 2025/26 data confirm this relationship, with the highest number of legal aid grants issued to applicants in the most deprived areas of Northern Ireland (MDM Quintile 1), across both criminal and civil case types (Figure 4.5; Table A17). In contrast, the lowest volume of grants were recorded in the least deprived areas (MDM Quintile 5).
A clear linear trend is observed, whereby the number of grants decreases as deprivation levels fall. This pattern is particularly pronounced in criminal cases. Civil grants also follow this trend overall, although a deviation is noted in Quintile 4. This anomaly may reflect the specific nature of certain civil matters and the influence of HM Prison Maghaberry, which is located within this quintile.
This section provides a brief exploration into the observed geographical relationship between the LGD in which the application is registered and that of the associated solicitor firm granted the legal aid certificate.
Access to legal aid services is transient by nature in that an assisted person is not restricted to use solicitor firms local to them. Table A18 details the number of applications granted to individuals registered within each LGD alongside any subsequent movement (inward and outward) of applications where an assisted person availed of a solicitor firm outside of their residing LGD.
Figure 4.6 illustrates the net movement of applications granted in 2025/26 where the darker shading highlights those LGDs that experienced a positive net movement of legal aid work. From the map it can be seen that the Belfast area had the largest net increase of 8,743. In contrast, Lisburn and Castlereagh showed the greatest net decrease of 4,934.
Table A1: Registered Legal Aid Service Providers by Type, 2019/20 to 2025/26
Provider | 2019/20 | 2020/21 | 2021/22 | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Solicitor Firms | 434 | 447 | 461 | 450 | 444 | 431 | 422 |
Solicitor Firms receiving payment | 429 | 394 | 404 | 405 | 376 | 374 | 357 |
Barristers | 601 | 647 | 686 | 669 | 639 | 639 | 633 |
of which Junior (Barrister at Law) | 504 | 540 | 568 | 552 | 509 | 509 | 514 |
of which Senior (Kings Counsel) | 97 | 107 | 118 | 117 | 130 | 130 | 119 |
Barristers receiving payment | 503 | 489 | 495 | 491 | 486 | 484 | 475 |
of which Junior (Barrister at Law) | 435 | 407 | 415 | 412 | 391 | 391 | 386 |
of which Senior (Kings Counsel) | 68 | 82 | 80 | 79 | 95 | 93 | 89 |
Third Party Payees | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
Third Party Payees receiving payment | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Table A2: Registered Solicitor Firms by Local Government District (LGD), Firms per 100,000 of Population and Average Minimum Distance to Nearest Solicitor Firm, 2025/26
Local Government District | Solicitor Firms | NI Population | Firms per 100k Population | Average Distance to nearest Firm (Miles) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Antrim and Newtownabbey | 14 | 148,100 | 9.5 | 1.5 |
Ards and North Down | 24 | 165,415 | 14.5 | 1.8 |
Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon | 47 | 222,511 | 21.1 | 2.1 |
Belfast | 149 | 352,390 | 42.3 | 0.5 |
Causeway Coast and Glens | 20 | 141,954 | 14.1 | 3.7 |
Derry City and Strabane | 32 | 152,383 | 21.0 | 2.5 |
Fermanagh and Omagh | 33 | 117,687 | 28.0 | 4.0 |
Lisburn and Castlereagh | 12 | 151,669 | 7.9 | 2.0 |
Mid and East Antrim | 19 | 139,913 | 13.6 | 2.4 |
Mid Ulster | 31 | 152,718 | 20.3 | 2.8 |
Newry, Mourne and Down | 41 | 183,115 | 22.4 | 3.0 |
Total | 422 | 1,927,855 | 21.9 | 2.2 |
Note:
Table A3: Authorised Expenditure by Provider Type, 2019/20 to 2025/26
Provider Type | 2019/20(£) | 2020/21(£) | 2021/22(£) | 2022/23(£) | 2023/24(£) | 2024/25(£) | 2025/26(£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Solicitor Firm | 54,500,110 | 44,519,869 | 55,801,329 | 59,061,226 | 62,884,201 | 67,952,773 | 70,491,135 |
Barrister | 27,681,686 | 30,747,086 | 39,155,613 | 42,303,440 | 50,735,190 | 51,534,139 | 50,043,348 |
of which Senior | 7,581,230 | 11,572,262 | 12,908,381 | 14,658,156 | 20,297,624 | 20,516,373 | 18,931,477 |
of which Junior | 20,100,456 | 19,174,825 | 26,247,232 | 27,645,284 | 30,437,566 | 31,017,767 | 31,111,871 |
Third Party Payee | 271,776 | 197,410 | 330,394 | 402,603 | 387,801 | 503,988 | 438,715 |
Total | 82,453,572 | 75,464,365 | 95,287,337 | 101,767,269 | 114,007,192 | 119,990,900 | 120,973,199 |
Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest £ and may not sum due to rounding.
Table A4: Authorised Expenditure by Provider Type and Category of Service, 2025/26
Category Of Service | Solicitor Firm(£) | Barrister(£) | Junior (Barrister at Law)(£) | Senior (Kings Counsel)(£) | Third Party Payee(£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criminal Total | 35,830,235 | 25,294,734 | 16,807,877 | 8,486,857 | 54,106 |
Criminal Courts | 31,034,795 | 25,294,734 | 16,807,877 | 8,486,857 | 54,106 |
Magistrates' Courts | 14,800,387 | 6,710,191 | 6,700,193 | 9,997 | 13,327 |
Crown Court | 14,704,353 | 16,122,793 | 8,767,125 | 7,355,668 | 32,514 |
Other Criminal Courts | 1,530,055 | 2,461,750 | 1,340,559 | 1,121,191 | 8,264 |
Criminal Advice and Assistance (PACE) | 4,795,440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Civil Total | 34,660,900 | 24,748,615 | 14,303,993 | 10,444,621 | 384,609 |
Advice and Assistance Civil | 2,032,064 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 247,920 |
Representation Lower | 6,813,601 | 393,267 | 393,267 | 0 | 15,621 |
Representation Higher | 25,207,333 | 23,770,938 | 13,637,359 | 10,133,579 | 121,069 |
Exceptional Funding | 607,902 | 584,409 | 273,367 | 311,042 | 0 |
Total | 70,491,135 | 50,043,348 | 31,111,871 | 18,931,477 | 438,715 |
Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest £ and may not sum due to rounding.
Table A5: Taxed Expenditure by Provider, Payment Type and Category of Service, 2025/26
Provider Type | Payment Type | Criminal - Court of Appeal(£) | Civil - Representation Higher(£) | Total(£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Solicitor | Profit Cost | 688,484 | 7,933,110 | 8,621,594 |
VAT | 137,697 | 1,580,395 | 1,718,092 | |
Disbursement | 62,064 | 4,820,698 | 4,882,762 | |
Total | 888,244 | 14,334,202 | 15,222,446 | |
Barrister | Profit Cost | 1,414,053 | 13,364,998 | 14,779,051 |
of which Senior | Profit Cost | 934,370 | 7,165,819 | 8,100,189 |
of which Junior | Profit Cost | 479,683 | 6,199,179 | 6,678,862 |
Barrister | VAT | 277,945 | 2,460,701 | 2,738,646 |
of which Senior | VAT | 186,874 | 1,433,164 | 1,620,038 |
of which Junior | VAT | 91,071 | 1,027,537 | 1,118,608 |
Barrister | Disbursement | 0 | -302 | -302 |
of which Senior | Disbursement | 0 | 324 | 324 |
of which Junior | Disbursement | 0 | -626 | -626 |
Barrister | Total | 1,691,998 | 15,825,396 | 17,517,394 |
of which Senior | Total | 1,121,243 | 8,599,307 | 9,720,550 |
of which Junior | Total | 570,754 | 7,226,090 | 7,796,844 |
All | Profit Cost | 2,102,537 | 21,298,107 | 23,400,644 |
VAT | 415,642 | 4,041,095 | 4,456,737 | |
Disbursement | 62,064 | 4,820,396 | 4,882,460 | |
Total | 2,580,242 | 30,159,599 | 32,739,841 |
Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest £ and may not sum due to rounding.
Table A6: Solicitor Firm Authorised Expenditure by Provided Legal Aid Service and Local Government District (LGD), 2025/26
Local Government District | Civil(£) | Criminal(£) | Total(£) |
|---|---|---|---|
Antrim and Newtownabbey | 1,329,096 | 912,664 | 2,241,761 |
Ards and North Down | 2,401,876 | 1,462,976 | 3,864,852 |
Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon | 2,956,442 | 2,572,163 | 5,528,604 |
Belfast | 15,707,639 | 18,851,367 | 34,559,006 |
Causeway Coast and Glens | 907,417 | 401,335 | 1,308,752 |
Derry City and Strabane | 3,195,766 | 3,860,476 | 7,056,242 |
Fermanagh and Omagh | 1,098,362 | 956,016 | 2,054,378 |
Lisburn and Castlereagh | 910,439 | 439,240 | 1,349,679 |
Mid and East Antrim | 930,251 | 1,124,215 | 2,054,466 |
Mid Ulster | 1,554,473 | 1,648,709 | 3,203,182 |
Newry, Mourne and Down | 3,669,140 | 3,601,073 | 7,270,213 |
Total | 34,660,900 | 35,830,234 | 70,491,135 |
Note:
Table A7: Authorised Expenditure by Provider and Payment Type, 2019/20 to 2025/26
Provider Type | Payment Type | 2019/20(£) | 2020/21(£) | 2021/22(£) | 2022/23(£) | 2023/24(£) | 2024/25(£) | 2025/26(£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Solicitor | Profit Cost | 39,327,900 | 31,665,727 | 39,802,298 | 41,492,567 | 43,553,024 | 47,847,783 | 49,225,530 |
VAT | 7,750,280 | 6,242,952 | 7,878,604 | 8,258,583 | 8,650,513 | 9,493,921 | 9,816,220 | |
Disbursement | 7,421,930 | 6,611,189 | 8,120,428 | 9,310,076 | 10,680,664 | 10,611,069 | 11,449,385 | |
Total | 54,500,110 | 44,519,869 | 55,801,329 | 59,061,226 | 62,884,201 | 67,952,773 | 70,491,135 | |
Barrister | Profit Cost | 23,735,629 | 26,078,903 | 33,248,512 | 36,038,555 | 42,963,207 | 43,566,414 | 42,373,629 |
VAT | 3,896,794 | 4,643,031 | 5,733,748 | 6,241,134 | 7,773,278 | 7,958,299 | 7,671,764 | |
Disbursement | 49,263 | 25,153 | 173,353 | 23,750 | -1,295 | 9,426 | -2,045 | |
Total | 27,681,686 | 30,747,086 | 39,155,613 | 42,303,440 | 50,735,190 | 51,534,139 | 50,043,348 | |
Third Party Payee | Profit Cost | 167,150 | 147,633 | 268,698 | 331,883 | 323,168 | 419,296 | 364,592 |
VAT | 33,045 | 29,527 | 53,721 | 66,230 | 64,632 | 83,885 | 72,924 | |
Disbursement | 71,581 | 20,250 | 7,976 | 4,490 | 0 | 807 | 1,200 | |
Total | 271,776 | 197,410 | 330,394 | 402,603 | 387,801 | 503,988 | 438,715 | |
All | Profit Cost | 63,230,678 | 57,892,263 | 73,319,508 | 77,863,006 | 86,839,400 | 91,833,494 | 91,963,751 |
VAT | 11,680,119 | 10,915,510 | 13,666,073 | 14,565,947 | 16,488,423 | 17,536,105 | 17,560,908 | |
Disbursement | 7,542,775 | 6,656,592 | 8,301,756 | 9,338,317 | 10,679,369 | 10,621,301 | 11,448,539 | |
Total | 82,453,572 | 75,464,365 | 95,287,337 | 101,767,269 | 114,007,192 | 119,990,900 | 120,973,199 |
Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest £ and may not sum due to rounding.
Table A8: Authorised Expenditure by Provider, Payment Type and Category of Service, 2025/26
Provider Type | Payment Type | Criminal - Criminal Courts(£) | Criminal - Magistrates' courts(£) | Criminal - Crown Court(£) | Criminal - Other Criminal Courts(£) | Criminal - PACE(£) | Criminal - Total(£) | Civil - Advice and Assistance(£) | Civil - Representation Lower(£) | Civil - Representation Higher(£) | Civil - Exceptional Funding(£) | Civil - Civil - Total(£) | Grand Total(£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Solicitor | Profit Cost | 23,417,144 | 12,007,144 | 10,230,343 | 1,179,657 | 3,943,814 | 27,360,958 | 1,671,971 | 5,004,864 | 14,730,877 | 456,859 | 21,864,572 | 49,225,530 |
VAT | 4,675,270 | 2,395,658 | 2,043,742 | 235,870 | 784,127 | 5,459,397 | 329,772 | 1,001,630 | 2,934,049 | 91,372 | 4,356,823 | 9,816,220 | |
Disbursement | 2,942,380 | 397,585 | 2,430,267 | 114,528 | 67,499 | 3,009,880 | 30,321 | 807,107 | 7,542,406 | 59,671 | 8,439,506 | 11,449,385 | |
Total | 31,034,795 | 14,800,387 | 14,704,353 | 1,530,055 | 4,795,440 | 35,830,235 | 2,032,064 | 6,813,601 | 25,207,333 | 607,902 | 34,660,900 | 70,491,135 | |
Barrister | Profit Cost | 21,355,512 | 5,790,851 | 13,493,244 | 2,071,416 | 0 | 21,355,512 | 0 | 343,094 | 20,179,026 | 495,998 | 21,018,118 | 42,373,629 |
VAT | 3,941,945 | 919,290 | 2,632,322 | 390,334 | 0 | 3,941,945 | 0 | 50,013 | 3,591,394 | 88,411 | 3,729,819 | 7,671,764 | |
Disbursement | -2,723 | 50 | -2,773 | 0 | 0 | -2,723 | 0 | 160 | 518 | 0 | 678 | -2,045 | |
Total | 25,294,734 | 6,710,191 | 16,122,793 | 2,461,750 | 0 | 25,294,734 | 0 | 393,267 | 23,770,938 | 584,409 | 24,748,614 | 50,043,348 | |
Third Party Payee | Profit Cost | 44,690 | 10,749 | 27,054 | 6,887 | 0 | 44,690 | 206,596 | 13,017 | 100,289 | 0 | 319,902 | 364,592 |
VAT | 8,938 | 2,150 | 5,411 | 1,378 | 0 | 8,938 | 41,324 | 2,604 | 20,058 | 0 | 63,986 | 72,924 | |
Disbursement | 478 | 428 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 478 | 0 | 0 | 721 | 0 | 721 | 1,200 | |
Total | 54,106 | 13,327 | 32,514 | 8,264 | 0 | 54,106 | 247,920 | 15,621 | 121,069 | 0 | 384,609 | 438,715 | |
All | Profit Cost | 44,817,346 | 17,808,745 | 23,750,641 | 3,257,960 | 3,943,814 | 48,761,159 | 1,878,567 | 5,360,975 | 35,010,193 | 952,857 | 43,202,592 | 91,963,751 |
VAT | 8,626,154 | 3,317,098 | 4,681,475 | 627,581 | 784,127 | 9,410,281 | 371,095 | 1,054,247 | 6,545,502 | 179,783 | 8,150,627 | 17,560,908 | |
Disbursement | 2,940,135 | 398,063 | 2,427,544 | 114,528 | 67,499 | 3,007,634 | 30,321 | 807,268 | 7,543,645 | 59,671 | 8,440,905 | 11,448,539 | |
Total | 56,383,635 | 21,523,906 | 30,859,660 | 4,000,069 | 4,795,440 | 61,179,074 | 2,279,984 | 7,222,489 | 49,099,339 | 1,192,311 | 59,794,124 | 120,973,199 |
Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest £ and may not sum due to rounding.
Table A9: Distribution of Profit Cost Expenditure Across Solicitor Firms, 2025/26
Profit Cost Expenditure Band | Count of Solicitor Firms | Percentage of Total Solicitor Firms | Profit Cost(£) | Percentage of Total Profit Cost | Average of Expenditure Band(£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | |||||
£1m + | 7 | 2.1% | 10,427,108 | 21.2% | 1,489,587 |
£750k to <£1m | 3 | 0.9% | 2,383,203 | 4.8% | 794,401 |
£500k to <£750k | 7 | 2.1% | 4,175,703 | 8.5% | 596,529 |
£250k to <£500k | 43 | 12.8% | 15,334,553 | 31.2% | 356,618 |
£100k to <£250k | 67 | 19.9% | 10,723,096 | 21.8% | 160,046 |
Under £100k | 209 | 62.2% | 6,181,868 | 12.6% | 29,578 |
Total | 336 | 100.0% | 49,225,530 | 100.0% | 146,505 |
Criminal | |||||
£1m + | 4 | 1.4% | 5,334,816 | 19.5% | 1,333,704 |
£750k to <£1m | 3 | 1.1% | 2,813,589 | 10.3% | 937,863 |
£500k to <£750k | 3 | 1.1% | 1,686,014 | 6.2% | 562,005 |
£250k to <£500k | 19 | 6.9% | 6,560,978 | 24.0% | 345,315 |
£100k to <£250k | 36 | 13.0% | 6,174,697 | 22.6% | 171,519 |
Under £100k | 212 | 76.5% | 4,790,865 | 17.5% | 22,598 |
Total | 277 | 100.0% | 27,360,958 | 100.0% | 98,776 |
Civil | |||||
£500k + | 3 | 1.0% | 1,585,315 | 7.3% | 528,438 |
£250k to <£500k | 11 | 3.5% | 3,590,408 | 16.4% | 326,401 |
£100k to <£250k | 64 | 20.3% | 9,829,980 | 45.0% | 153,593 |
Under £100k | 237 | 75.2% | 6,858,870 | 31.4% | 28,940 |
Total | 315 | 100.0% | 21,864,572 | 100.0% | 69,411 |
Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest £ and may not sum due to rounding.
Table A10: Distribution of Criminal Profit Cost Expenditure Across Solicitor Firms, 2025/26
Profit Cost Expenditure Band | Count of Solicitor Firms | Percentage of Total Solicitor Firms | Profit Cost(£) | Percentage of Criminal Profit Cost | Average of Expenditure Band(£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criminal Total | |||||
£1m + | 4 | 1.4% | 5,334,816 | 19.5% | 1,333,704 |
£750k to <£1m | 3 | 1.1% | 2,813,589 | 10.3% | 937,863 |
£500k to <£750k | 3 | 1.1% | 1,686,014 | 6.2% | 562,005 |
£250k to <£500k | 19 | 6.9% | 6,560,978 | 24.0% | 345,315 |
£100k to <£250k | 36 | 13.0% | 6,174,697 | 22.6% | 171,519 |
Under £100k | 212 | 76.5% | 4,790,865 | 17.5% | 22,598 |
Total | 277 | 100.0% | 27,360,958 | 100.0% | 98,776 |
Advice and Assistance (PACE) | |||||
£125k + | 3 | 1.3% | 550,851 | 14.0% | 183,617 |
£100k to <£125k | 5 | 2.2% | 531,029 | 13.5% | 106,206 |
£50k to <£100k | 17 | 7.5% | 1,093,004 | 27.7% | 64,294 |
£25k to <£50k | 19 | 8.3% | 690,923 | 17.5% | 36,364 |
Under £25k | 184 | 80.7% | 1,078,005 | 27.3% | 5,859 |
Total | 228 | 100.0% | 3,943,814 | 100.0% | 17,297 |
Magistrates' Courts | |||||
£250k + | 10 | 3.9% | 3,844,418 | 32.0% | 384,442 |
£100k to <£250k | 27 | 10.5% | 3,812,632 | 31.8% | 141,209 |
£50k to <£100k | 30 | 11.6% | 2,139,772 | 17.8% | 71,326 |
Under £50k | 191 | 74.0% | 2,210,323 | 18.4% | 11,572 |
Total | 258 | 100.0% | 12,007,144 | 100.0% | 46,539 |
Crown Court | |||||
£500k + | 3 | 1.5% | 2,807,708 | 27.4% | 935,903 |
£250k to <£500k | 4 | 2.1% | 1,282,838 | 12.5% | 320,710 |
£100k to <£250k | 19 | 9.7% | 2,699,117 | 26.4% | 142,059 |
Under £100k | 169 | 86.7% | 3,440,681 | 33.6% | 20,359 |
Total | 195 | 100.0% | 10,230,343 | 100.0% | 52,463 |
Other Criminal Courts | |||||
£25k + | 4 | 1.9% | 535,812 | 45.4% | 133,953 |
£10k to <£25k | 16 | 7.7% | 235,471 | 20.0% | 14,717 |
£5k to <£10k | 26 | 12.6% | 182,025 | 15.4% | 7,001 |
Under £5k | 161 | 77.8% | 226,348 | 19.2% | 1,406 |
Total | 207 | 100.0% | 1,179,657 | 100.0% | 5,699 |
Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest £ and may not sum due to rounding.
Table A11: Distribution of Civil Profit Cost Expenditure Across Solicitor Firms, 2025/26
Profit Cost Expenditure Band | Count of Solicitor Firms | Percentage of Total Solicitor Firms | Profit Cost(£) | Percentage of Civil Profit Cost | Average of Expenditure Band(£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Civil | |||||
£500k + | 3 | 1.0% | 1,585,315 | 7.3% | 528,438 |
£250k to <£500k | 11 | 3.5% | 3,590,408 | 16.4% | 326,401 |
£100k to <£250k | 64 | 20.3% | 9,829,980 | 45.0% | 153,593 |
Under £100k | 237 | 75.2% | 6,858,870 | 31.4% | 28,940 |
Total | 315 | 100.0% | 21,864,572 | 100.0% | 69,411 |
Advice and Assistance (civil) | |||||
£100k + | 4 | 2.1% | 829,705 | 49.6% | 207,426 |
£50k to <£100k | 3 | 1.5% | 190,556 | 11.4% | 63,519 |
£25k to <£50k | 5 | 2.6% | 164,358 | 9.8% | 32,872 |
£10k to <£25k | 10 | 5.1% | 190,027 | 11.4% | 19,003 |
Under £10k | 173 | 88.7% | 297,325 | 17.8% | 1,719 |
Total | 195 | 100.0% | 1,671,971 | 100.0% | 8,574 |
Representation Lower | |||||
£100k + | 3 | 1.1% | 341,635 | 6.8% | 113,878 |
£75k to <£100k | 7 | 2.6% | 613,299 | 12.3% | 87,614 |
£50k to <£75k | 19 | 7.1% | 1,158,205 | 23.1% | 60,958 |
£25k to <£50k | 40 | 14.9% | 1,301,674 | 26.0% | 32,542 |
Under £25k | 199 | 74.3% | 1,590,051 | 31.8% | 7,990 |
Total | 268 | 100.0% | 5,004,864 | 100.0% | 18,675 |
Representation Higher | |||||
£500k + | 3 | 1.0% | 2,130,103 | 14.5% | 710,034 |
£250k to <£500k | 9 | 3.1% | 3,192,176 | 21.7% | 354,686 |
£100k to <£250k | 29 | 10.1% | 4,234,216 | 28.7% | 146,007 |
£50k to <£100k | 35 | 12.2% | 2,405,962 | 16.3% | 68,742 |
Under £50k | 211 | 73.5% | 2,768,421 | 18.8% | 13,120 |
Total | 287 | 100.0% | 14,730,877 | 100.0% | 51,327 |
Exceptional Funding | |||||
£25k + | 4 | 22.2% | 366,381 | 80.2% | 91,595 |
£10k to <£25k | 3 | 16.7% | 52,141 | 11.4% | 17,380 |
Under £10k | 11 | 61.1% | 38,338 | 8.4% | 3,485 |
Total | 18 | 100.0% | 456,859 | 100.0% | 25,381 |
Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest £ and may not sum due to rounding.
Table A12: Distribution of Profit Cost Expenditure Across Barristers, 2025/26
Profit Cost Expenditure Band | Count of Barristers | Percentage of Total Barristers | Profit Cost(£) | Percentage of Total Profit Cost | Average of Expenditure Band(£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | |||||
£750k + | 3 | 0.6% | 2,858,121 | 6.7% | 952,707 |
£500k to <£750k | 4 | 0.8% | 2,193,721 | 5.2% | 548,430 |
£250k to <£500k | 32 | 6.8% | 10,395,295 | 24.5% | 324,853 |
£100k to <£250k | 108 | 22.8% | 16,307,986 | 38.5% | 151,000 |
Under £100k | 327 | 69.0% | 10,618,507 | 25.1% | 32,472 |
Total | 474 | 100.0% | 42,373,629 | 100.0% | 89,396 |
Criminal | |||||
£500k + | 3 | 1.2% | 1,566,607 | 7.3% | 522,202 |
£250k to <£500k | 19 | 7.3% | 5,950,617 | 27.9% | 313,190 |
£100k to <£250k | 54 | 20.8% | 8,131,122 | 38.1% | 150,576 |
Under £100k | 183 | 70.7% | 5,707,165 | 26.7% | 31,187 |
Total | 259 | 100.0% | 21,355,512 | 100.0% | 82,454 |
Civil | |||||
£750k + | 3 | 0.7% | 2,858,121 | 13.6% | 952,707 |
£250k to <£750k | 11 | 2.7% | 3,817,217 | 18.2% | 347,020 |
£100k to <£250k | 48 | 11.8% | 7,094,420 | 33.8% | 147,800 |
Under £100k | 345 | 84.8% | 7,248,360 | 34.5% | 21,010 |
Total | 407 | 100.0% | 21,018,118 | 100.0% | 51,642 |
Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest £ and may not sum due to rounding.
Table A13: Distribution of Criminal Profit Cost Expenditure Across Barristers, 2025/26
Profit Cost Expenditure Band | Count of Barristers | Percentage of Total Barristers | Profit Cost(£) | Percentage of Criminal Profit Cost | Average of Expenditure Band(£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criminal Total | |||||
£500k + | 3 | 1.2% | 1,566,607 | 7.3% | 522,202 |
£250k to <£500k | 19 | 7.3% | 5,950,616 | 27.9% | 313,190 |
£100k to <£250k | 54 | 20.8% | 8,131,122 | 38.1% | 150,576 |
Under £100k | 183 | 70.7% | 5,707,165 | 26.7% | 31,187 |
Total | 259 | 100.0% | 21,355,512 | 100.0% | 82,454 |
Magistrates' Court | |||||
£100k + | 9 | 4.8% | 1,305,700 | 22.5% | 145,078 |
£75k to <£100k | 12 | 6.5% | 1,019,018 | 17.6% | 84,918 |
£50k to <£75k | 25 | 13.4% | 1,518,976 | 26.2% | 60,759 |
£25k to <£50k | 30 | 16.1% | 1,147,947 | 19.8% | 38,265 |
Under £25k | 110 | 59.1% | 799,211 | 13.8% | 7,266 |
Total | 186 | 100.0% | 5,790,851 | 100.0% | 31,134 |
Crown Court | |||||
£250k + | 11 | 5.0% | 3,823,940 | 28.3% | 347,631 |
£100k to <£250k | 28 | 12.8% | 4,592,279 | 34.0% | 164,010 |
£50k to <£100k | 41 | 18.7% | 2,897,750 | 21.5% | 70,677 |
£25k to <£50k | 39 | 17.8% | 1,427,653 | 10.6% | 36,606 |
Under £25k | 100 | 45.7% | 751,622 | 5.6% | 7,516 |
Total | 219 | 100.0% | 13,493,244 | 100.0% | 61,613 |
Other Criminal Courts | |||||
£100k + | 4 | 2.5% | 596,039 | 28.8% | 149,010 |
£50k to <£100k | 4 | 2.5% | 301,580 | 14.6% | 75,395 |
£25k to <£50k | 14 | 8.6% | 470,558 | 22.7% | 33,611 |
Under £25k | 140 | 86.4% | 703,239 | 33.9% | 5,023 |
Total | 162 | 100.0% | 2,071,416 | 100.0% | 12,787 |
Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest £ and may not sum due to rounding.
Table A14: Distribution of Civil Profit Cost Expenditure Across Barristers, 2025/26
Profit Cost Expenditure Band | Count of Barristers | Percentage of Total Barristers | Profit Cost(£) | Percentage of Civil Profit Cost | Average of Expenditure Band(£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Civil | |||||
£750k + | 3 | 0.7% | 2,858,121 | 13.6% | 952,707 |
£250k to <£750k | 11 | 2.7% | 3,817,217 | 18.2% | 347,020 |
£100k to <£250k | 48 | 11.8% | 7,094,420 | 33.8% | 147,800 |
Under £100k | 345 | 84.8% | 7,248,360 | 34.5% | 21,010 |
Total | 407 | 100.0% | 21,018,118 | 100.0% | 51,642 |
Representation Lower | |||||
£10k + | 10 | 10.2% | 126,337 | 36.8% | 12,634 |
£5k to <£10k | 13 | 13.3% | 89,252 | 26.0% | 6,866 |
Under £5k | 75 | 76.5% | 127,504 | 37.2% | 1,700 |
Total | 98 | 100.0% | 343,094 | 100.0% | 3,501 |
Representation Higher | |||||
£750k + | 3 | 0.7% | 2,845,283 | 14.1% | 948,428 |
£250k to <£750k | 11 | 2.7% | 3,806,082 | 18.9% | 346,007 |
£100k to <£250k | 45 | 11.2% | 6,624,951 | 32.8% | 147,221 |
Under £100k | 343 | 85.3% | 6,902,710 | 34.2% | 20,125 |
Total | 402 | 100.0% | 20,179,026 | 100.0% | 50,197 |
Exceptional Funding | |||||
£25k + | 5 | 23.8% | 359,061 | 72.4% | 71,812 |
£10k to <£25k | 8 | 38.1% | 113,891 | 23.0% | 14,236 |
Under £10k | 8 | 38.1% | 23,046 | 4.6% | 2,881 |
Total | 21 | 100.0% | 495,998 | 100.0% | 23,619 |
Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest £ and may not sum due to rounding.
Table A15: Applications granted and associated relative index values, by gender and age band, 2025/26
Gender | Age Band | Applications Granted - Criminal | Applications Granted - Civil | Applications Granted - Total | NI Population | Grants per 1,000 population - Criminal | Grants per 1,000 population - Civil | Grants per 1,000 population - Total | Relative Utilisation Index Values - Criminal | Relative Utilisation Index Values - Civil | Relative Utilisation Index Values - Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female | Under 18 | 641 | 938 | 1,579 | 212,466 | 3.0 | 4.4 | 7.4 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 |
18 to 24 | 1,005 | 817 | 1,822 | 72,147 | 13.9 | 11.3 | 25.3 | 14.4 | 8.0 | 10.6 | |
25 to 29 | 1,098 | 1,332 | 2,430 | 56,881 | 19.3 | 23.4 | 42.7 | 19.9 | 16.6 | 17.9 | |
30 to 39 | 2,770 | 3,526 | 6,296 | 130,090 | 21.3 | 27.1 | 48.4 | 22.0 | 19.2 | 20.3 | |
40 to 49 | 1,505 | 1,927 | 3,432 | 126,724 | 11.9 | 15.2 | 27.1 | 12.2 | 10.8 | 11.4 | |
50 to 59 | 673 | 720 | 1,393 | 130,259 | 5.2 | 5.5 | 10.7 | 5.3 | 3.9 | 4.5 | |
60+ | 242 | 352 | 594 | 249,498 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
ALL | 8,013 | 9,612 | 17,625 | 978,065 | 8.2 | 9.8 | 18.0 | - | - | - | |
Male | Under 18 | 1,627 | 1,108 | 2,735 | 223,070 | 7.3 | 5.0 | 12.3 | 7.5 | 3.5 | 5.1 |
18 to 24 | 5,384 | 960 | 6,344 | 78,222 | 68.8 | 12.3 | 81.1 | 71.0 | 8.7 | 34.1 | |
25 to 29 | 5,490 | 1,394 | 6,884 | 59,008 | 93.0 | 23.6 | 116.7 | 95.9 | 16.7 | 49.0 | |
30 to 39 | 12,159 | 3,200 | 15,359 | 123,977 | 98.1 | 25.8 | 123.9 | 101.1 | 18.3 | 52.0 | |
40 to 49 | 6,539 | 1,836 | 8,375 | 119,416 | 54.8 | 15.4 | 70.1 | 56.5 | 10.9 | 29.5 | |
50 to 59 | 2,565 | 676 | 3,241 | 125,010 | 20.5 | 5.4 | 25.9 | 21.2 | 3.8 | 10.9 | |
60+ | 1,485 | 394 | 1,879 | 221,087 | 6.7 | 1.8 | 8.5 | 6.9 | 1.3 | 3.6 | |
ALL | 35,387 | 9,568 | 44,955 | 949,790 | 37.3 | 10.1 | 47.3 | - | - | - |
Note:
Table A16: Applications granted, by Local Government District (LGD), 2025/26
Local Government District (LGD) | Applications Granted - Criminal | Applications Granted - Civil | Applications Granted - Total | NI Population | Applications granted per 1,000 population - Criminal | Applications granted per 1,000 population - Civil | Applications granted per 1,000 population - Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antrim and Newtownabbey | 2,296 | 1,084 | 3,380 | 148,100 | 15.5 | 7.3 | 22.8 |
Ards and North Down | 2,123 | 1,150 | 3,273 | 165,415 | 12.8 | 7.0 | 19.8 |
Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon | 3,922 | 1,587 | 5,509 | 222,511 | 17.6 | 7.1 | 24.8 |
Belfast | 11,343 | 5,034 | 16,377 | 352,390 | 32.2 | 14.3 | 46.5 |
Causeway Coast and Glens | 1,920 | 1,158 | 3,078 | 141,954 | 13.5 | 8.2 | 21.7 |
Derry City and Strabane | 3,972 | 1,343 | 5,315 | 152,383 | 26.1 | 8.8 | 34.9 |
Fermanagh and Omagh | 1,474 | 567 | 2,041 | 117,687 | 12.5 | 4.8 | 17.3 |
Lisburn and Castlereagh | 2,625 | 3,372 | 5,997 | 151,669 | 17.3 | 22.2 | 39.5 |
Mid and East Antrim | 2,404 | 813 | 3,217 | 139,913 | 17.2 | 5.8 | 23.0 |
Mid Ulster | 1,990 | 661 | 2,651 | 152,718 | 13.0 | 4.3 | 17.4 |
Newry, Mourne and Down | 3,321 | 1,375 | 4,696 | 183,115 | 18.1 | 7.5 | 25.6 |
Northern Ireland (Total) | 43,432 | 19,195 | 62,627 | 1,927,855 | 22.5 | 10.0 | 32.5 |
Note:
Table A17: Applications granted, by area of deprivation (MDM), 2025/26
MDM Quintile | Applications Granted - Criminal | Applications Granted - Civil | Applications Granted - Total |
|---|---|---|---|
Quintile 1 (most deprived) | 15,196 | 5,791 | 20,987 |
Quintile 2 | 7,973 | 3,253 | 11,226 |
Quintile 3 | 5,834 | 2,852 | 8,686 |
Quintile 4 | 5,532 | 4,358 | 9,890 |
Quintile 5 (least deprived) | 2,855 | 1,890 | 4,745 |
Northern Ireland (Total) | 43,432 | 19,195 | 62,627 |
Note:
Table A18: Legal Aid Movement across Local Government Districts in Northern Ireland, 2025/26
Local Government District (LGD) | Applications Granted to Assisted Persons | Applications Out | Applications In | Net Movement of Applications - | Net Movement of Applications - | Cases Granted to Solicitor Firms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antrim and Newtownabbey | 3,380 | 2,837 | 1,061 | -1,776 | -52.5% | 1,604 |
Ards and North Down | 3,273 | 1,981 | 1,743 | -238 | -7.3% | 3,035 |
Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon | 5,509 | 1,940 | 1,499 | -441 | -8.0% | 5,068 |
Belfast | 16,377 | 2,975 | 11,718 | 8,743 | 53.4% | 25,120 |
Causeway Coast and Glens | 3,078 | 2,375 | 208 | -2,167 | -70.4% | 911 |
Derry City and Strabane | 5,315 | 763 | 2,184 | 1,421 | 26.7% | 6,736 |
Fermanagh and Omagh | 2,041 | 898 | 288 | -610 | -29.9% | 1,431 |
Lisburn and Castlereagh | 5,997 | 5,370 | 436 | -4,934 | -82.3% | 1,063 |
Mid and East Antrim | 3,217 | 2,004 | 1,058 | -946 | -29.4% | 2,271 |
Mid Ulster | 2,651 | 1,050 | 602 | -448 | -16.9% | 2,203 |
Newry, Mourne and Down | 4,696 | 1,154 | 2,550 | 1,396 | 29.7% | 6,092 |
Note:
© Crown copyright 2026
This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v 3.0 except where otherwise stated.
Under the terms of this Licence, you may use and re-use the information contained in this publication (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium with only a few conditions as set out via the hyperlink above.
Official Statistics are statistics produced by Crown bodies and other organisations listed within an Official Statistics Order, on behalf of the UK government or devolved administrations. They provide a factual basis for assessment and decisions on economic, social and environmental issues at all levels of society. This broad definition of official statistics means that the scope of official statistics can be adapted over time to suit changing circumstances.
Our statistical practice is regulated by the Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR).
OSR sets the standards of trustworthiness, quality and value in the Code of Practice for Statistics that all producers of official statistics should adhere to.
You are welcome to contact us directly with any comments about how we meet these standards. Alternatively, you can contact OSR by emailing regulation@statistics.gov.uk or via the OSR website.
Further information on this publication including definitions and technical notes can be accessed through the LSANI Annual Statistics User Guide.
We welcome comment and feedback on these statistics. If you would like to forward your views or be added to our mailing list to be informed about future publications, please use the contact details provided at the top of this publication.